http://ww.itimes.com/brands/the-good-guys 12/10/14 Brittany Bahr
1. Paste the url of the reviewed blog first.
http://ge110brittanyba.blogspot.com
2. Why did the blog draw your interest as you started reviewing it, why not?
The blog drew my interest by the background of the blog. The blog has bright colors as a background it looks very nice. Having pictures in the blog makes it forth looking at.
3. How much care did the blog author show for her or his blog? How can you tell?
I can tell the Brittany put a lot of time in the blog. For example, not only does she have a lot of text but she has pictures too.
4. How would you rate the overall informative quality on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would give it a 5 out of 5 because the great depth her blogs displays.
5. How would you rate the readability of the blog on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would rate the readability of the blog a 5 also because you learn something reading her blog.
6. Compared to your own blog, is the reviewed blog better, the same, or worse?
Comparing her blog to my blog I would say that very similar but in the end of the day her blog is better than mine.
Nathan McMahon
1. Paste the url of the reviewed blog first.
http://ge110nathanmc.blogspot.com
2. Why did the blog draw your interest as you started reviewing it, why not?
The blog is little boring because I don’t see a lot of pictures that draw me in to reading the text. In Nathan’s defense there are some pictures on some of the blog post.
3. How much care did the blog author show for her or his blog? How can you tell?
I would say that he gave average amount of care into the blog. I can tell by the lack of keeping people involved into his blog.
4. How would you rate the overall informative quality on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would rate the overall informative quality a 4.
5. How would you rate the readability of the blog on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would rate the readability of the blog a 3.
6. Compared to your own blog, is the reviewed blog better, the same, or worse?
Comparing Nathan’s blog to my blog, I would say that I put a little more effort in creating a blog that is easy for the readers to read.
http://consumerist.com/2007/12/03/americas-52-worst-nursing-homes/ 12/10/14 James Otten
1. Paste the url of the reviewed blog first.
http://ge110jamesot.blogspot.com
2. Why did the blog draw your interest as you started reviewing it, why not?
I have no interest in this blog because James hasn’t posted anything since September 9.
3. How much care did the blog author show for her or his blog? How can you tell?
James dropped the class or he just doesn’t care to post material in his blog. I can tell by his inactive responds he has.
4. How would you rate the overall informative quality on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would rate this blog a 0 on overall informative quality.
5. How would you rate the readability of the blog on a scale of 1-5(five is high)?
I would rate this blog a 0 on the readability.
6. Compared to your own blog, is the reviewed blog better, the same, or worse?
Comparing James’ blog to my blog, I would say that hands down my blog in better. For after all I have never missed a blog post and James hasn’t posted anything since September 9
No comments:
Post a Comment